Proving Patent Infringement has Occurred

Posted by Admin under Patents

Proving Patent Infringement has Occurred

Proving that patent infringement has occurred is not quite as cut and dry as it should seem. Lawyers are of course well versed in patent infringement law, but the average individual will have a very difficult time deciphering laws on their own.

A lawyer has much more investigative ability than a business or an individual. Through the use of the court system, a lawyer has the ability to request the violating company’s records as well as subpoena information related to a pending case. Businesses and individuals are not capable of gaining access to this vital information.

Lawyers are looking for research documentation, or any documentation that points to any foreseen knowledge that there was even the possibility of a patent infraction. Patent infringement is a serious offense and most companies are very careful with their documentation if they believe they are even the slightest bit close to violating a patent law. However, a high quality lawyer is typically able to pull out one or two documents that point to evidence of knowledge of impending patent infringement.

While lawyers are not miracle workers or mind readers, they are quiet capable of proving, with the help of the governmental patent agencies, that the patent was already in existence and that a simple search of patent records would have enable to the company or individual in question to perform an adequate patent search which would have in effect, thwarted any impending patent infringement.

In most cases, proving it could have been avoided simply by performing a reasonable patent search, lawyers can realistically prove that the company did not perform its due diligence in an attempt to avoid it in the first place.

Proving induced patent infringement can be a little more difficult than proving direct patent infringement. Induced patent infringement, just like direct patent infringement, can be a result of either accidental or intentional actions.

Induced patent infringement can involve third parties, packaging issues, or even selling a product under the guise of a function that can only be reasonably utilized under a protected patent. A skilled lawyer can prove that the induced patent infringement either could have been prevented or should have been preventable through either research in the production of the product or through marketing research.

Patent infringement is a larger problem than many companies, businesses, and organizations realize. Lawyers try numerous cases per year. Considering the population of lawyers, this totals into the thousands of cases annually. It is not always obvious, as in indirect patent infringement.

When cases of it do occur, proof tends to lie within the accused company whether there was previous knowledge of the patent prior to release of the product or invention. Proving intent can be a very difficult procedure unless the company documented that they were predisposed to the information and went ahead with the project despite the likelihood of a patent infringement. Lawyers state that they typically do not struggle to prove the infringement, but often have great difficulty proving intent or prior knowledge.

Because there are various avenues which a company can be the victim of a patent infringement and because these intentions can be difficult to prove, the absolute first step in protecting patent rights is calling a high quality lawyer. This step allows for legal proceedings to begin and allows for evidence and proof to be sought. Without retaining a lawyer, the chances of ever recouping lost profits is beyond minimal.

It is a silent crime, one which in the technology of yesterday allowed for many companies to get away with until post production and profit loss. Fortunately today many companies are able to head off profit loss when patent infringement is caught before production and sales. Lawyers are being able to prove it that are only in the design and modeling stages in a few cases.

If you believe that you, your company, or your business is in jeopardy of being the victim of paten infringement, it is wise to call a quality lawyer immediately. Waiting can cost you, and often cost you more than you can really afford to lose. Playing it safe even if your suspicions are just that, don’t hesitate to contact a competent lawyer. Patent infringement is too costly to wait.

Nick Johnson, lead counsel and founding partner of Johnson Law Group, represents individuals or companies with cases involving patent infringement. Find more information at: http://www.toppatentinfringementlawyers.com or call 1-888-311-5522

No Comments

When Can an American Sue For Copyright Infringement For a Website?

Posted by Admin under Copyrights

When Can an American Sue For Copyright Infringement For a Website?

This article is for an American who believes their copyright has been infringed on the internet and is considering filing a lawsuit. This article will help an American know whether or not they have a sound case for copyright infringement. This article will help an American know their chances of success in winning the case. In the following paragraphs, a copyright infringement scenario over the internet will be discussed.

The scenario involves “Ryan’s Sports Blog” web site (fictional name) and “Tiara’s Good Girls in Good Dresses” web site (fictional name). Ryan has had a lot of success with his web site; he gets 100,000 hits a month. Tiara is just getting started and only attracts 20 hits a month. Ryan writes opinion articles on NFL players regarding their temperament off the field when and if they get drunk. He has written an article on Henry Malroy, (fictional name) the starting quarterback for the Gotham City, Knights (fictional team). He writes, “Henry Malroy seems like a real cool dude. I bet he’s a happy drunk. His girlfriend loves it when Henry gets drunk because when he’s drunk she can get anything she wants. It’s like, ‘here baby, take this check and buy yourself that SUV.’ or ‘here baby, take this check and go rent out that theme park for the weekend and invite all your friends and I’ll gather a few guys from the team and others. Take this check and rent out that limo and take a few of your friends out to cruise the city. Take this check and take yourself and some of your friends to get a massage. Take this check and go that club and buy drinks for your friends and everybody at the club. Take this check and go to that store and buy five dresses, of course the ones that you like, of course the ones that are most expensive.” So Ryan writes that.

Tiara’s site is focused on young women who call themselves “good girls,” and only where pretty white dresses. She sees the article about Henry Malroy and decides to use a portion of it for a post on her site. She titles the post, “A Good Man for a Good Girl Even When He’s Drunk.” She writes, “So I was reading this article from this web site, ‘Ryan’s Sports Blog,’ and ladies I just had to share some of this. It’s talking about Henry Malroy, who is a dream guy. I mean he’s rich, tall talented and all that. But this thing goes on to talk about his drunk temperament. Now, of course good girls shouldn’t be with drunks but maybe I’d make an exception if the temperament was like this. So this guy Ryan writes, “When Henry gets drunk his girl likes it because when he’s drunk she can get anything she wants. It’s like, ‘here baby, take this check and buy yourself that SUV.’ or ‘here baby, take this check and go rent out that theme park for the weekend and invite all your friends and I’ll gather a few guys from the team and others. Take this check and rent out that limo and take a few of your friends out to cruise the city. Take this check and take some friends to get a massage. Take this check and go that club and buy drinks for your friends and everybody at the club. Take this check and go to that store and buy five dresses, of course the ones that you like, of course the ones that are most expensive.” So Tiara writes that.

Could Ryan file a lawsuit for copyright infringement against Tiara? What would his chances of success be?

Well, Tiara didn’t take exactly what Ryan wrote word for word in her post. She did use some of his words but she also added some of her own. Plus, Tiara has referenced Ryan’s site. She has given him credit. Giving a person credit for their work does not protect an American from copyright infringement. In fact, it will just help Ryan have success in proving he has been wronged.

The other issue is the amount of words she has used that were his. She could be off the hook if the court finds she just took a short phrase or an insignificant amount of borrowed text from Ryan’s article. Copyright law does not protect short phrases or common words. However, Tiara has taken a large portion of Ryan’s post. Tiara has given credit to him but she did not bother to ask for his permission to use his words. She has not even attempted to significantly change his words.

Another issue is fact vs. opinion. If Ryan had written about hard facts in this article, then Tiara could have copied it and not be concerned with a lawsuit. Facts are not copyright protected. However, what Ryan has written is an opinion article and one that is creative and unique. His success in court looks very good. Tiara could be sued.

However, no suit can be filed without an official receipt of copyright from the U.S. Copyright Office. In other words, Ryan would have to have registered his article with the copyright office before the infringement took place. That is, if he is looking to get punitive damages. If he registers after the wrong has taken place then all he can get are damages to compensate him and make him whole. He will have to prove exactly how much money he has lost due to this situation.

In conclusion, Ryan can sue Tiara. Ryan should have a strong case and good chance for success. Success may or may not have any money in it for Ryan besides Tiara paying his court costs. It depends if Ryan had previously registered his work before the crime took place. Also it could depend on what Ryan can prove as far as what money he has actually lost due to the infringement. However, regardless of the amount of money, the court will order Tiara to take down the work she borrowed from Ryan.

“sam”

EBay, Facebook, Vivendi, General Motors, Ford: Intellectual Property EBay.com Inc. ’s PayPal Unit was sued by Continue reading this entry…

No Comments

Swing Trading Secrets Strategies for Finding a Swing Trading Method That Works for You

Posted by Admin under Trade Secrets

Swing Trading Secrets Strategies for Finding a Swing Trading Method That Works for You

Discover secrets of swing trading my mimicking great swing traders who trade awesome systems. Learn how to dramatically yank massive potential profits over and over on a continual basis from the stock market, the stock options market, the futures market, the Forex markets and even the emini’s markets (which is the futures market).

Why swing trading success seems so secret to many is a mystery to me. Go take a look at charts. Study them carefully. Start counting the days. You should be able to start identifying patterns. But the key is that you need to be able to identify a method of entry and exit off the stock patterns.

Yes not only do you need to understand patterns for entry for swing trading, you need the swing trading secrets entry and exit mechanisms that can net you out a profit. Not just make a great gain here or there. Your NET profits must be there. This also means that you must carefully examine your costs. Your costs are the flip flops, the losses, the stops, the trades that don’t’ work out.

How are you going to determine you’re your most efficient place for stop loss placement? You need to compare day bar versus intraday bars for reference for your stop losses. Intraday bars, such as the 60 min bars carry many secrets for efficient entry and exit . But the challenge with Intraday bars is that they often require more observation and watching in terms of trading. But the profits can be high and the costs can be low so check it out. If you could make, or at least work up to 0,000 a month trading intraday bars, it’s probably well worth your efforts.

Otherwise day bar swing trading is very liberating. You can simply trade the day bars by night. You can even trade options by night through the use of contingent orders which is awesome. Simply place your orders before the next day’s market open and your swing orders can be triggered by stop to enter orders or by contingent orders on your options. You can also use one follows the other or one triggers another orders to help automate the order process for you.

You are going to have to pick stocks that tend to swing well. Now you can pick stocks that move a lot of points or a little amount of points but the bottom line is that the stock needs to tends to swing smoothly. Every stock, future or Forex pair has a historical behavior or character associated with it and that character gives you and edge. Edges in trading make money.

All in all the swing trading secrets will be found by you through the process of getting in the game, getting your hands dirty, rolling up your sleeves and diving in to start figuring out the nitty gritty details on entry, cost and potential profit. Until you work out your system, demo trade it then trade it real time you’ll never really know, you’ll never really find out if your ideas are actually workable. So get to work and one day you’ll crack the code to discovering swing trading secrets that can actually create a significant and ongoing profit for you, a profit that could provide you a very good living from trading the markets.

Clark is an expert in options trading who has traded options for a very good living for some time now. Here is is new favorite site that puts out excellent short term options trading ideas located at:
http://www.slingshotoptions..com

Ind. scientist accused of stealing trade secrets A former Indiana scientist accused of illegally sending trade secrets worth 0 million to China and Germany has Continue reading this entry…

No Comments

I have an SSA question related to an expert witness who can’t testify…… Who else may testify?

Posted by Admin under Questions

Question by tk_ayer: I have an SSA question related to an expert witness who can’t testify…… Who else may testify? When a medical expert with a given specialty is not available to testify on my behalf, who else may testify and what his/her testimony consist of? Best answer:

Answer by BobbyK
You still must have a qualified medical expert testify or the other team will tear them apart. Anyone may testify for you but they will get torn apart if they don’t know what they are talking about or have the credentials to follow.

What do you think? Answer below!

No Comments

Patent Infringement Violators Beware

Posted by Admin under Patents

Patent Infringement Violators Beware

For those who believe that patent infringement isn’t taken very seriously in the United States, it’s time to wake up and smell the potential. Lawsuits are becoming increasingly popular as attorneys are out for damages. Lawsuits have been cropping up like wildfire, and attorneys have been doing their fair share to hold those accountable to the fullest extent of the law. With optimized research equipment and tools, violators will have a very difficult time sliding under the radar.

Don’t make the serious error in believing that only large companies hire patent infringement attorneys and file whopping lawsuits. Small companies and individual inventors are now retaining top notch attorneys and going after those who are in violation of laws. There is no longer a sense of tolerance for the theft of another’s inventive product. From entire inventions to existing product enhancements, lawsuits mean serious damages, and serious judgments.

The true issue behind patent infringement is the inventor’s ability to successfully introduce his or her invention as his own, and retain the rights of marketing and resale to profit from their own ingenious. Laws were laid down to protect the inventor from theft.

Until recently, lawsuits were rare, difficult to prosecute, and in many cases not worth the effort. This is no longer the case. Attorneys have brought to the forefront of business law just how vital those laws really are, and the lawsuits which have followed are quite obviously proof in the pudding.

While there are still cases of accidental patent infringement, those cases are declining and more cases of intention, or willful patent infringement are becoming the mainstay. Either way, a good attorney can still bring a very successful lawsuit against an individual or company for their violation. Attorneys have worked hard in the past to pave the way for the current climate in lawsuits.

In many cases, these lawsuits are filed by big business. Kodak, Coca-Cola, and other house hold name brands have brought lawsuits against violators of patent laws. Patent protection is there to protect both big business and the individual in the event of patent infringement. These attorneys represent both big business as well as the individual. As any attorney can testify to, patent infringement harms big business just as fast as it harm the small business or individual inventor.

These lawsuits are based on either direct or indirect patent infringement. While it takes a knowledgeable attorney to explain the finer details of patent infringement, there are various avenues which can lead to it.

Direct patent infringement is the very obvious and blatant theft of another’s invention, product, or enhancement while indirect patent infringement may mean an infringement of labeling or even deceptive marketing. Lawsuits are not lost or won based on the degree of infringement, rather they are lost and won based on whether or not it occurred at all. Patent infringement attorneys are the best resources for determining whether it has occurred.

Most attorneys can equate the theft of an idea with the theft of intellectual material, as the ideas and inventions worth stealing come from the unique minds of individuals who work in very intelligent and unique ways.

These lawsuits seek to punitive rewards for those who steal the hard work and ingenious of others. Patent infringement lawsuits are becoming a necessity in today’s society. If an individual inventor or a company has been the victim of it, there really is no reason to hesitate to file a patent infringement lawsuit. Speaking with a qualified attorney can provide the knowledge base necessary to determine whether or not a lawsuit is within the company’s or individual’s best interest.

Violators of patent infringement need to beware of aggressive attorneys. There is of course no honor in stealing from another, and attorneys can expose an invention thief in open court during a lawsuit. Given that option I would consider coming up with your own ideas. A lawsuit is destined to wipe out the culprit, as awards for it tend to be very high. Even the best representation can not hide a patent violator from the truths that are revealed in a lawsuit.

Nick Johnson, lead counsel and founding partner of Johnson Law Group, represents individuals or companies with cases involving patent infringement. Find more information at: http://www.toppatentinfringementlawyers.com or call 1-888-311-5522

Why Microsoft Co-Founder Is Suing Tech Industry In a major patent-infringement lawsuit, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen levels a broadside against Google and many other leading Continue reading this entry…

No Comments

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software